Every two years or so, there is a spike in media interest in how JustGiving operates. Today, it was the turn of the Daily Mail, which questioned our fees, and the fact that we pay market rates for the people who work for the company.   

Our response to those questions remains the same: charities deserve the best. More charities, fundraisers and, more recently, crowdfunders choose JustGiving than any other platform because they raise more, net of fees, than cheaper or free alternatives.

We firmly believe that the best way to deliver a consistently great, and continuously improving, fundraising experience for all our users is to operate as a for-profit, for-good organisation. JustGiving helps good causes raise more money, and grows faster than others, precisely because we make a profit and plough it (all of it) back into making our service better. We do a better job also because we hire great talent, and pay market rates. In the real world, engineers, product managers and data scientists do not work for free.

The irony of all this is that, when we launched JustGiving 16 years ago, charities questioned the wisdom of being transparent about our fees. We could have chosen to obscure them, but instead we decided to publish them on every page of our site: charities pay between 5 and 2% on gross donations, which is excellent value for money compared to standard (and much higher) fundraising costs involved in other methods. You can read more about our fees from this blog post in 2014.

Last year the JustGiving community raised over £440m for good causes. This year, we look forward to breaking the half-a-billion record. This could not be achieved without continuous investment, and a great team working day in, day out, to help good causes grow.

I have spent most of my professional life working for non-profits, directly or indirectly. I am chronically baffled by the suggestion that a good charity should be a poor one, run on a shoe string. Does anyone really want to go back to the Victorian form of fundraising, of shaking tins outside the church hall? With charities now running big chunks of the social safety net of this country, not to mention essential medical research – to name just some of the essential things that charities do for all of us – I really do not think so. Instead, charities deserve the best, and it’s the job of successful, sustainable businesses like JustGiving to make that happen.

We’ve been heartened by the response of hundreds of charities today. Here are some of them below. Thank you.

https://twitter.com/oneinfourirish/status/828924656673505281

We support @JustGiving :their service is excellent for donor & charity alike, and worth the small fees. Unjust criticism in today's press.

— London Music Fund (@londonmusicfund) February 7, 2017

https://twitter.com/missellabell/status/828968625377779713

https://twitter.com/missellabell/status/828968934795784193

https://twitter.com/missellabell/status/828969420793978880

@JustGiving is the biggest innovation for #fundraising in the past 20 years.
Period.

— Russell Benson (@russellbenson) February 7, 2017

https://twitter.com/JosephFreeman/status/828902870506434561

https://twitter.com/LucyCaldicott/status/828886586087579648

A huge thanks to @JustGiving for all they do to support charities. Keep up the fantastic work!

— David Burgess (@DavidBurgessFR) February 7, 2017